Explained randomness in proportional hazards models.

نویسندگان

  • John O'Quigley
  • Ronghui Xu
  • Janez Stare
چکیده

A coefficient of explained randomness, analogous to explained variation but for non-linear models, was presented by Kent. The construct hinges upon the notion of Kullback-Leibler information gain. Kent and O'Quigley developed these ideas, obtaining simple, multiple and partial coefficients for the situation of proportional hazards regression. Their approach was based upon the idea of transforming a general proportional hazards model to a specific one of Weibull form. Xu and O'Quigley developed a more direct approach, more in harmony with the semi-parametric nature of the proportional hazards model thereby simplifying inference and allowing, for instance, the use of time dependent covariates. A potential drawback to the coefficient of Xu and O'Quigley is its interpretation as explained randomness in the covariate given time. An investigator might feel that the interpretation of the Kent and O'Quigley coefficient, as a proportion of explained randomness of time given the covariate, is preferable. One purpose of this note is to indicate that, under an independent censoring assumption, the two population coefficients coincide. Thus the simpler inferential setting for Xu and O'Quigley can also be applied to the coefficient of Kent and O'Quigley. Our second purpose is to point out that a sample-based coefficient in common use in the SAS statistical package can be interpreted as an estimate of explained randomness when there is no censoring. When there is censoring the SAS coefficient would not seem satisfactory in that its population counterpart depends on an independent censoring mechanism. However there is a quick fix and we argue in favour of its use.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The evaluation of Cox and Weibull proportional hazards models and their applications to identify factors influencing survival time in acute leukem

Introduction: The most important models used in analysis of survival data is proportional hazards models. Applying this model requires establishment of the relevance proportional hazards assumption, otherwise it world lead to incorrect inference. This study aims to evaluate Cox and Weibull models which are used in identification of effective factors on survival time in acute leukemia. Me...

متن کامل

A measure of explained risk in the proportional hazards model.

A measure of explained risk is developed for application with the proportional hazards model. The statistic, which is called the estimated explained relative risk, has a simple analytical form and is unaffected by censoring that is independent of survival time conditional on the covariates. An asymptotic confidence interval for the limiting value of the estimated explained relative risk is deri...

متن کامل

Reliability Modelling with Fuzzy Covariates

Uncertainty is an intrinsic feature of data containing the underlying information of reliability engineering realities. Randomness and fuzziness are two different type uncertainties although there is certain link between them. Cox’s PH (Proportional Hazards) models and Lawless and Thiagarajah’s CIF (Conditional Intensity Function) models addressed the random uncertainty in a very general format...

متن کامل

استفاده از مدل چندجمله‌ای کسری در تعیین عوامل مرتبط با بقای بیماران مبتلا به سرطان معده

Background & Objectives: Cox regression model is one of the statistical methods in survival analysis. The use of smoothing techniques in Cox model makes the more accurate estimates for the parameters. Fractional polynomial is one of these techniques in Cox model. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of prognostic factors on survival of patients with gastric cancer using the fractiona...

متن کامل

Biased Estimates of Effect when a Strong but Balanced Covariate is Omitted from a Proportional Hazards Model

In the analysis of epidemiologic data, potential confounders that are balanced between study groups are often omitted from models estimating the effect of the determinant of interest. An extreme example is that of randomized trials where all potential confounders are omitted if groups appear balanced at baseline due to the randomization of patients. It has been shown, however, that baseline com...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Statistics in medicine

دوره 24 3  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2005